Episode 494: Robert Seacord on Avoiding Defects in C Programming : Software program Engineering Radio

Transcript delivered to you by IEEE Software program journal.
This transcript was robotically generated. To recommend enhancements within the textual content, please contact content material@laptop.org and embrace the episode quantity and URL.

Gavin Henry 00:01:06 Welcome to Software program Engineering Radio. I’m your host, Gavin Henry, and at the moment my visitor is Robert Seacord. Robert Seacord is a Technical Director at NCC Group the place he develops and delivers safe coding coaching in C and C++ and different languages. Seacord is an professional on the C Requirements. His six earlier books embrace CERT C Coding Normal and Safe Coding in C and C++. Robert, welcome to Software program Engineering Radio. Is there something I missed in your bio that you just’d like so as to add?

Robert Seacord 00:01:36 No, that was fairly full. Thanks for having me right here.

Gavin Henry 00:01:40 A pleasure. So, I’d like to begin off with a quick historical past of the C language after which contact on why programming in C may be insecure. We’re going to additionally then transfer on to high 5 safety points. After which the final little bit of the present goes to be speaking on the varied methods and instruments we will use to assist us write safe C packages. Okay? Small disclosure, I’d point out an open-source venture I’m engaged on known as SentryPeer, which is written in C for varied issues which have come up whereas I’ve been writing the code and instruments. I discovered safety points I believed that weren’t a difficulty and issues I discovered in your books and the sections on methods to enhance your code. I believe it’ll be a pleasant bit. So, let’s lay down some foundations: when was C created?

Robert Seacord 00:02:35 I needed to look this up as a result of I’m truly not fairly that previous, however it first appeared in 1972. And it was developed by Dennis Ritchie at Bell Laboratories in New Jersey. So, it’s had a really lengthy historical past. It was primarily based on a typeless language known as B, as you may think, as a result of programmers have by no means been superb at naming issues.

Gavin Henry 00:03:01 Cool, are there such a factor as variations, or how does that work?

Robert Seacord 00:03:05 Properly yeah, there’s loads of variation in what we name C, proper? So, there was KRC, which was a Kerningham-Ritchie, form of corresponded to their e book again within the 70s. And again within the 70s, ANSI began a committee to standardize the language. In order that they printed their first customary in 1989. In order that’s also known as C89, and the subsequent yr that was printed by ISO. So it was quick observe to the worldwide requirements group as C90, and lots of people have assured me, together with John Benito, who was the earlier convenor of the C requirements committee, that these two requirements are precisely the identical. There’s only a totally different cowl web page. Nevertheless it’s truly fairly laborious to seek out copies of these unique requirements. However loads of embedded code continues to be written in C90 after which there’s been a number of variations, main variations of the Normal launch license.

Robert Seacord 00:04:10 So the subsequent one was C99. And C99 was a bit gradual on adoption, however it had a bunch of options. C11 was the primary customary that I labored on from starting to finish, and C11 primarily launched parallel programming, concurrent programming, threads, thread library, atomics. And it was meant to additionally deal with safety. I’m unsure it did pretty much as good a job of addressing safety because it did addressing parallel execution, however we did add issues like Annex Ok, which is the certain checking interface or the underbar S features. Many individuals suppose that underbar S operate stands for Safety, however it truly stands for Bounds Managed Interface. And we added that we had an Annex L, which was analyzability annex and we made another small enhancements right here and there to deal with safety. That was C11. Yeah. 2011. We simply had the only digits I imply, I assume finally we’ll wrap round, however I hope to be useless by then and anticipate it to be another person’s downside.

Gavin Henry 00:05:31 You talked about ANSI, that’s the American…?

Robert Seacord 00:05:33 Yeah, that’s American Nationwide Requirements Institute however these days it’s truly, there’s a gaggle known as Insights, which is type of below the umbrella of ANSI. And so, if you’re within the US you’re a member of the Insights Committee, and Insights will get a single vote in ISO, so ISO is the Worldwide Requirements physique, so it’s one nation, one vote at ISO. And the Committee is definitely, it’s very US-centric. We had a gathering some years in the past in Delft within the Netherlands, and there’s a portion of the assembly the place, we simply deal with Insights enterprise. So we requested individuals who aren’t a part of the US physique to go away. And the one individual to go away was the host of the assembly. And this was a gathering happening in Europe. There was just one European there, and it was the host. So normally we get higher participation from Northern Europe, Canada, however not a lot past there; hasn’t been loads of participation from Asia or elsewhere these days.

Gavin Henry 00:06:50 And is that as a result of C’s not used there, or they don’t take part?

Robert Seacord 00:06:54 It is perhaps used there, however it’s all of the compiler distributors are within the US primarily. There’s IBM, their compiler group is in Markham in Canada. And so, that’s truly the Canadian illustration is from IBM, the well-known Canadian firm, after all.

Gavin Henry 00:07:16 So there’s not likely variations; it’s the usual and that adjustments every…?

Robert Seacord 00:07:24 Yeah, so the variations of the usual, after which that type of drives the baseline. So there’s C11, C17. C17, some folks mistakenly name it C18 as a result of it was printed by ISO in 2018, however it’s truly the 2017 customary. And that was actually an uncommon one. It was simply actually bug fixes of C11. So, nobody actually must be utilizing C11. C11 is like C17 with bugs, and C17 is C11 with out bugs, however there’s, after all all of the compiler distributors repair all of the bugs in C11. So that you received’t see them anymore, no matter which customary you specify. And so C17 is a present model and we’re at present engaged on C23 and the deadline for papers to introduce new options has come and gone as of this previous, I believe it was as of November. And so, we all know what’s not going to be in C23 proper now, which is something we haven’t obtained a paper on and what’s going to be in it’s nonetheless up within the air as a result of we now have to, we’ll see if we will get consensus on the remaining proposals which are in entrance of the committee.

Gavin Henry 00:08:40 And that’s what results in the compiler, doesn’t it — the model or customary the compiler helps?

Robert Seacord 00:08:47 Properly, it may, proper? So to begin with, after we create the usual and C there’s a robust requirement for current implementations, proper? So, the C committee greater than most committees doesn’t wish to invent issues. We’d like to seek out issues which are being utilized in apply that might profit from standardization as a result of which may improve portability over plenty of platforms, after which get it into the usual. And typically the committee will, I’ll use the time period “make enhancements” to current apply. They do wish to fiddle and that’s good and dangerous. I imply, it’s good to possibly make some enhancements, however on the identical time now it’s not simply precisely current in apply anymore, that you just made some adjustments to it. And a few issues like Annex Ok, the committee fiddled with {that a} bit and obtained to the purpose the place the present implementation from Microsoft turned non-conforming to the usual, and so they weren’t actually up for altering it. And so, the usual — I’m looking for a distinct phrase than “customary” — it units a normal.

Gavin Henry 00:10:11 No, however you touched on a superb level in there that the usual is there to bolster portability. I believe that’s what you’re making an attempt to get to.

Robert Seacord 00:10:19 Yeah. However all these compilers, they’re at all times, every implementation, proper? Every compiler implementation exists over a continuum, proper? So, you’ll have a compiler that has say, possibly it’s absolutely carried out to C99, however they’re working in direction of implementing all of the C11 or C17 options, proper? And so it’s someplace in-between. After which most compilers have compiler-specific extensions that you should utilize, proper? Which aren’t standardized. And so, so each implementation there’s loads of variation, every type of customary model is type of a distinct taste of the language. After which the precise compiler implementations they’ll fall into totally different areas when it comes to which requirements they implement and which further options. So, there’s a constant type of transportable spine, however there’s a certain quantity of variation form of constructed on high of that.

Gavin Henry 00:11:30 Yeah. Simply pertaining to the bit the place you spoke about it’s actually C17 and never C18, in my open supply venture that I discussed, once I was getting the continual integration duties arrange, to construct my venture with the compiler flags I placed on, it was GCC customary C18, trigger I’m working Fedora Linux newest from my desktop, like develop on, however the runners had been, this code was constructed on GitHub. Trigger you’ve been to twenty LTS and so they didn’t have that flagged assist in these PCCs. I believe it was there. Or once I was testing on web BSD and open BSD, they didn’t, they solely assist C11. So even issues, not even that a few years previous, they haven’t caught up or it’s simply the model of compile that was launched with the working system. So, I perceive what you imply by relying on how the compilers had been carried out and who’s rolled them out.

Robert Seacord 00:12:31 Yeah. And you recognize, Microsoft has at all times been an fascinating case as a result of they’ve at all times been type of snug, partially supporting requirements. So supporting components of requirements they like, however ignoring components they don’t.

Gavin Henry 00:12:46 However then it’s not likely a normal, is it? You both do all of it, otherwise you don’t.

Robert Seacord 00:12:50 Yeah, that’s true. So for a very long time, they didn’t like all of the components of C99, and so they simply form of took a go on these bits, however they’ve type of introduced a route the place they wish to type of turn out to be extra aligned with the C customary. They haven’t been sending anybody to the committee conferences, so it’s laborious to inform precisely what their future relationship with the language is. However compilers like Clang and GCC do an excellent job form of maintaining with the most recent model of the requirements. And you may get some, even C23 form of options supported in these compilers as nicely.

Gavin Henry 00:13:36 Glorious. Properly, I’m going to maneuver us onto the subsequent part of the present, which was actually in regards to the high 5 safety points that I’ve give you a little bit of analysis, and I would like you to right me on them. So earlier than we dig into these 5, if we may spend a minute or two to know why a C program may be insecure after which we’ll dig into the 5 points I’ve listed?

Robert Seacord 00:14:02 Properly, yeah so, in all programming languages are insecure and so they’re all general-purpose programming languages. So all of them can type of obtain the identical issues, proper? In order that they have the identical, they’re all Turing full, and so they’ve obtained totally different abstractions, totally different idioms for programming in these languages. However, in the way in which languages are damaged they are often fairly totally different, proper? As a result of that’s, that’s not an intentional design; it’s type of the defect floor of the language, or nevertheless you wish to describe it. And so, if you happen to take a look at a language like Java, which had been billed as a safe language for a few years, it’s obtained some severe issues with issues like deserialization, which mainly permits an attacker to execute their very own code inside your digital machine.

Gavin Henry 00:15:07 Very topical language for the time being, isn’t it with all the pieces that’s been happening the previous two weeks. We’ve got to watch out of timelines on this sort of present, however the huge with log4 J.

Robert Seacord 00:15:22 Yeah. And I imply, that’s, I haven’t studied that fastidiously. I imply, that largely looks as if a design flaw.

Gavin Henry 00:15:29 It’s form of, such as you stated, the place code may be injected and it runs the place it shouldn’t be.

Robert Seacord 00:15:34 So yeah Java has obtained a fairly important assault floor and it’s at a sure degree the place it type of within the libraries and within the options and ways in which these options may be type of misused to take advantage of the code, C being type of an easier compiled language doesn’t have that assault floor. However C and C++ are type of well-known for reminiscence issues of safety. And these are issues the place, mainly, you learn or write exterior the bounds of an object and C and C++, these languages are designed to be optimally environment friendly. In order that they type of belief the programmer’s not going to make these kind of errors. And it seems that belief had been very misplaced as a result of programmers make these errors on a regular basis. And if you happen to write exterior the bounds of an object, that may have varied penalties as undefined conduct, relying on what that write does it may overwrite information, it may overwrite operate pointers, it may overwrite the return deal with on the stack. And attackers can exploit that form of downside by amongst different issues, injecting code into your course of and overwriting the return deal with on stack with the deal with of that malicious code so when a operate goes return, as a substitute of returned to the caller, it executes codes that’s been injected by the attacker after which that code runs with the permissions of the susceptible course of. In order that’s a fairly important type of assault.

Gavin Henry 00:17:25 Okay. Properly that’s a superb overview of some issues that will be insecure. Let me break down a few of them earlier than we begin on this subsequent bit, after we’re speaking about C you talked about the phrase object, which at all times makes me consider an object-oriented program, like a JavaScript object or a Java one, what can we imply in C after we speak about an object?

Robert Seacord 00:17:49 Oh, I didn’t know this was going to be a very deeply technical dialog.

Gavin Henry 00:17:54 Properly, I suppose you may make it only a single-sentence definition of an object.

Robert Seacord 00:18:02 Yeah. We’ve got a reminiscence administration examine group that’s making an attempt to reply that query.

Gavin Henry 00:18:07 Perhaps we will’t do a easy reply then?

Robert Seacord 00:18:10 However mainly an object is –- okay, I imply, in C you’ve gotten features and you’ve got objects, proper? So an object is all the pieces that’s not a operate. In order that’s a, variable can be an object or you possibly can have an object in dynamically allotted storage. So yeah, it’s mainly a…

Gavin Henry 00:18:31 Sure, that’s right. That’s precisely what I used to be simply going to learn out of your e book. So in your e book, Efficient C, you say “an object is storage in which you’ll be able to symbolize values. To be exact, an object is outlined by the C customary as a area of knowledge storage within the execution atmosphere, the contents of which might symbolize values.” The added be aware “when a reference object may be interpreted as having a selected kind.” So yeah, that may be a huge tick for that reply. Thanks.

Robert Seacord 00:19:03 Thanks, I’m glad I’m constant.

Gavin Henry 00:19:06 So yeah, you touched on a few issues that I used to be going to tug aside shortly on that to do with how these reminiscence points are literally exploited. We’ll begin off from my record. So do my very own venture and different issues like that at any time when I save one thing or I’m engaged on an ID and I push it to Github, I’ve obtained all types of static evaluation on it that we’ll point out it within the subsequent part, however it normally comes again with one thing like a string challenge. So I’ve at all times understood strings to be a safety challenge as in not terminated or an array of characters. Individuals deal with it not as a string when it’s not a string. Might you give us some data on why a string may be insecure?

Robert Seacord 00:19:56 Yeah. Strings are form of tough. So strings are, they’re not a primitive kind in both C or C++. In order that they’re constructed on high of arrays and C arrays are problematic in and of themselves, proper? And so for starters, we all know that there’s no implicit bounds checking and there’s loads of features corresponding to stir copy the place you’re copying a string from a supply to a vacation spot, and it’s going to repeat the whole size of the string, however there’s no indication in that operate of the dimensions, say of the vacation spot array. And so stir copy will simply do what you ask it to do, which is copy from this sources, this vacation spot, with out checking to see if there’s room for that, to make that duplicate of string contained in the bounds of that vacation spot object.

Robert Seacord 00:21:00 And so the issue with the arrays, one of many issues with arrays is if you go them to a operate, they decay to a degree or two, the primary component of the array. And so when you’re contained in the operate, there isn’t a solution to decide the dimensions of the whole array. In order that dimension data must be handed to be accessible. So features like stir copy that don’t handed the dimensions, there’s a library features, trusting you the programmer to go it an object, which is able to match to the vacation spot. Proper. And if it doesn’t, you’ll have this undefined conduct and this probably susceptible code.

Gavin Henry 00:21:45 I at all times keep in mind that the title of an array can also be a pointer. So if you go it right into a operate that, such as you stated, it, the keys to simply the pointer, you possibly can nonetheless discover out what kind of level that’s inside your operate? So is that right?

Robert Seacord 00:22:05 Properly, I imply, the kind of the purpose is the pointers tight so, I imply, you could possibly have void pointers in C, however that’s not notably an awesome thought. So usually a string can be a char pointer, I imply, usually, I imply, accurately, it might be a char pointer. However you don’t know the way lengthy it’s. And even, the concept it’s an array is just not essentially the case, proper? It may simply be a pointer to a single character.

Gavin Henry 00:22:41 So do it’s a must to take into consideration what may I’ve seen the place they go within the lens? They normally lose one of many customary features, string lands, however once more, that operate has to determine how lengthy the string is. So do it’s a must to take an additional step and ensure it’s not terminated? Or do you’ve gotten, or is there one thing that we will attain to so we don’t have to consider any of this for strings? What do you advocate?

Robert Seacord 00:23:08 So once more, there’s no string kind, there’s no premise string kind. So it’s an array and the definition of a string is that mainly there’s no character earlier than the certain, proper? So if there isn’t a character earlier than the certain, it’s not truly a string, itís a personality array, proper? And that’s okay. It’s okay to have a personality array in C, it’s outlined conduct. Nevertheless it turns into undefined conduct if you happen to go a personality array right into a stirling operate. As a result of it’s going to look at every component of that character array for no character. And it’s going to proceed on the lookout for no character to seek out one. So if string size, which once more it doesn’t take a dimension, it doesn’t know what dimension the string is that it’s inspecting. If it doesn’t discover a no character earlier than the certain, it’s going to proceed to search for a match by way of reminiscence for no character. And as quickly as that operate, accesses storage past the bounds of the array, it’s now undefined conduct, proper? And after getting undefined conduct in your code, all bets are off. That program can now exhibit any kind of conduct. So there’s actually requirement to make sure that any string you go to a string operate is definitely a string, which means that it has no termination earlier than the certain.

Gavin Henry 00:24:41 Yeah. I’ve seen a few of the documentation on a few of the string features that look to work across the house. Then they are saying, if there’s no unknown character discovered at that size that you just go, then we’ll make certain there’s one there.

Robert Seacord 00:24:58 Proper, and loads of features, newer type of safer features will be sure that after they create a string, that it’ll, it is going to be correctly, no terminated. Should you, if you happen to maybe give it extra information than it has room to retailer in no matter sized object you’ve gotten, then it is going to overwrite the final character making an attempt to retailer with a no character. So that you’ve obtained a correctly, no terminate string. And so I imply this alternative of a datatype was made early on and will very nicely be the flawed information kind. I imply possibly having a dimension adopted by the string and never utilizing a no termination, possibly that will have been a greater extra environment friendly, safer design, however it’s not one thing that’s more likely to change at this level within the, within the evolution of those languages.

Gavin Henry 00:26:02 And I believe to maneuver on to quantity two on my record now, I believe we’ve touched a bit bit on it and I’ve known as this buffer overruns and underruns, and I believe you’ve helped me perceive the query I used to be going to ask within the part the place in my venture, basically, Peer one, I’ve obtained some errors on my ID the place I’m doing a, I believe it’s a string and examine some, mainly checking a URL that is available in to see if it matches the info to one in every of my features. So I’ve obtained the URL and I’ve obtained how the dimensions of how lengthy it went to look alongside the array of chart to discover a match mainly. So I’ve given it a max paths size, I believe it’s of 1,024 or one thing. However my ID says, I shouldn’t verify that URL string longer than the strings there, although it finds a match. So my duties all work, as a result of I believe that’s simply what you’ve defined there. As soon as it will get previous the chart of the array of chart, which could not be a string I take advantage of not terminated, all bets are off as a result of it’s on the effective conduct when it will get to say chart 101 of the URL, that’s 100 chart lengthy.

Robert Seacord 00:27:21 You positively can’t study characters past the bounds of that object, past the bounds of that character array.

Gavin Henry 00:27:31 Sure so I believe when the URL is available in, you must do a dimension verify on it after which ensure you’re not checking previous that from match, is that the proper means?

Robert Seacord 00:27:40 Sure. I imply, so that you’ve obtained a max path buffer that you just’re storing it in. So that you’ve obtained that quantity of room for that array, however you’re evaluating it to a different string. And so that you don’t wish to exceed the bounds of both of these character array.

Gavin Henry 00:28:04 Truly the string and examine. So I’ve obtained the URL on the size of the string that I wish to examine in opposition to. So like 4 slash house, I wish to be sure that goes to the precise place or about, or one thing about web page and I’ve obtained a max size. So it’s going alongside that string for so long as I handed size for when it says thatís dangerous, however you don’t know the way lengthy the trail is till you’ve calculated the trail. We form of get on this rooster and egg kind scenario. However yeah. So after we speak about going previous the tip of array, that will be an overrun? Is {that a} buffer overrun? Or is that an underrun?

Robert Seacord 00:28:46 So there’s these phrases that they kicked round in safety like buffer overflow and buffer underrun and overrun. And I don’t know what any of these phrases imply. I imply they’re form of loosely used phrases in safety, however they don’t have very exact definitions. So within the C language, actually, we simply speak about an entry exterior of the bounds of an object. And we don’t care about what that entry seems to be like, proper? So you could possibly begin in the beginning of an array and you may increment a degree or an index after which run off the tip of the array, proper? And that’s an out of certain entry. You would possibly name {that a} buffer overflow. After which you could possibly begin on the finish of an array and you could possibly detriment the pointer and you may run off that finish of the reminiscence.

Robert Seacord 00:29:42 Typically you’ll simply type of arbitrarily bounce from, you may need some type of integer right here and bounce from accessing an array to some random place and reminiscence. And once more, I don’t know what that’s known as. That’s a buffer overflow or buffer overrun, however it’s simply, it’s positively an entry exterior of the bounds of that object, which is undefined conduct. You possibly can’t take a degree or two in an array and you may add or subtract interger worth to it. So long as the pointers nonetheless refers back to the identical array or to at least one path that array the too far component. But when the pointer you type from that pointer arithmetic, is exterior of that certain, it’s simply undefined conduct. And what you name it, form of varies. There’s it’s a bit bit unrelated, however folks like to speak about integer overflow and integer underflow in C, however there’s truly no such factor as integer underflow. That’s simply somebody’s creation. You probably have an operation into operation at types of worth, that may’t be represented, that’s integer overflow there’s there isn’t a such factor as integer underflow, however folks like to make use of that time period for no matter purpose.

Gavin Henry 00:31:07 Properly, it’s a superb rationalization. Thanks. So we’ve performed one thing right here the place we’ve gone exterior the bounds of what we’re making an attempt to do. The third factor on my record is what I’ve known as reminiscence leaks. So if you request some reminiscence from the working system with one of many allocation features and also you don’t free it, so that you get what I believe is named the flawed time leak, runtime leak or corrupt reminiscence. So runtime can be the place you’re regularly asking for this reminiscence, however you’re not releasing it. So that you’re utilizing greater than you need to be. Is {that a} right definition?

Robert Seacord 00:31:47 Thereís loads of stuff that was barely flawed in that query.

Gavin Henry 00:31:53 Thatís what I wish to hear. Right me.

Robert Seacord 00:31:55 Yeah. So for starters there’s a reminiscence allocation operate, proper? Malik Cadillac, realigned Alec, and none of those immediately request reminiscence from the working system. Proper? So the method has a reminiscence allocator that runs as a part of the identical course of base, proper? And so your reminiscence allocator will request a really massive block of reminiscence from the working system, after which it is going to handle that. And so if you make a name to Malik, it’s allocating storage, is allocating a chunk of storage from this massive block of reminiscence that the reminiscence managerís managing inside the course of, proper?

Gavin Henry 00:32:38 So a part of the kernel that’s doing this reminiscence administration?

Robert Seacord 00:32:42 No, it’s all in your course of. So the reminiscence administration, you’re going to hyperlink to a library and that library has implementations of stir copy and Malik, and all of those features run as a part of your executable, in your course of.

Gavin Henry 00:32:58 So this isn’t like a reminiscence pool that I’ve created. That is one thing to do with how I execute invoice has created?

Robert Seacord 00:33:05 So I imply, if you begin up, the reminiscence supervisor goes to go to the working system, itís going to get a block of reminiscence. However then as soon as it will get this massive block, which is mainly the heap, your reminiscence supervisor is just not going to handle that heap storage for you. So, if you make a request to Malik, that’s going to execute the Malik operate, which is a part of this reminiscence supervisor implementation. And it’s going to say what’s the subsequent accessible variety of the subsequent accessible block of reminiscence that’s at the very least this variety of bytes massive, and carve that off this larger block and return that to the consumer. In order that whole course of doesn’t contain the Kernel at that time, proper? That blocks thatís been carved out. The one time they’ll Kernel would possibly turn out to be concerned once more is if you happen to utterly use all of the allotted reminiscence from the working system, you would possibly then search to type of lengthen that. However that one implementation doesn’t essentially, I imply, the opposite chance is that at that time, that location would fail for an insufficient reminiscence.

Gavin Henry 00:34:23 Okay and so after we’re speaking about these bounce issues that occur, I’m not going to make use of the phrase overrun or undrawn okay. Does it make a distinction if it’s over, does one thing I’ll bounce into reminiscence that we haven’t freed, or are we contained inside what the reminiscence allocation device has given us from reminiscence? Or is it simply undefined? Is there a distinction between, so we’ve corrupt a few of our personal reminiscence are usually not free to, after which one in every of these array operations we’re doing finally ends up making an attempt to enter that it’s simply undefined or? What Iím making an attempt to ask is, if you see exploits of these kind of issues, and there, they know that we’re not cleansing up reminiscence, or there’s some kind of reminiscence they will get to with this exploit to run their very own code. How do they predictably get out that if this stuff had been all fairly undefined and random?

Robert Seacord 00:35:23 Properly, an undefined is a time period utilized by the usual, proper? So, the usual says, merely we haven’t outlined what occurs right here. And so specific implementation is after all, goes to do one thing. And since it’s not outlined by the usual, what it does, you as a programmer don’t actually know what it does, proper? So typically the implementation type of align along with your expectations of program or what kind of conduct you’re going to get, wherein case you could possibly have code, you could possibly have executable generated from code containing undefined conduct, which is definitely right, however extra generally if you happen to’re invoking undefined conduct that means that you just don’t have an accurate understanding of the language, with reference to that conduct. And most definitely the code is ISRA. Now after we speak about reminiscence, warmth reminiscence, there’s a number of lessons of potential errors, which might result in vulnerabilities. The primary one, which we’ve form of mentioned in arrays, buffer overflows, proper?

Robert Seacord 00:36:38 So buffer, overflows can happen in any reminiscence section to allow them to happen within the stack, within the information section or within the heap. And the consequence is, so an overflow within the heap, and anytime you write exterior the bounds of an object, itís undefined conduct.

Gavin Henry 00:36:57 Are you able to outline the stack within the heap briefly simply in context?

Robert Seacord 00:37:01 So the stack within the heap, I imply Iíll say, Iíll begin out by saying that neither idea is outlined within the C customary. So these are form of like implementation ideas, however usually a stack is a knowledge construction which helps program execution by permitting you to have a operate that calls one other operate after which creates a stack body for operate that it’s calling the place it preserves all of the native variables and arguments which are being handed to that operate and so forth.

Robert Seacord 00:37:42 After which that operate may name one other operate and that operate may recurse, proper? So you could possibly wind up with a number of situations of the identical operate on the stack. After which as soon as the operate returns, the stack type of unwind. So you’d flip again to the calling operate and re-established that operate stack body so it has entry to the native variables. And so the execution stack is a knowledge construction to permit for this mainly useful type of programming. In order that’s a stack and typical variable that you’d declare inside a operate, a non-static variable, if you happen to simply have a operate app and also you IDE, that variable an automated variable, that’s declared within the scope of that operate. And what occurs is if you name that operate, a stack body will get created for that operate and situations that variable will get allotted on the stack, proper?

Robert Seacord 00:38:44 And so as soon as that operate returns the lifetime of that, that variable ends, and it will possibly not be accessed. So that you’ve obtained two different information segments. You might have the info section, which is the place static variables go and static variables, will the place variable are, they’ve the identical lifetime as that of this system. In order that they’re at all times accessible. And that’s the place you would possibly hold a counter or one thing, proper? The place operate will come, you’ll name a operate node, you’ll increment this counter, the operate will exit, however the rely will nonetheless stay as a result of it’s a world variable. And world variables have their makes use of and so they have their issues. However the subsequent kind of the subsequent section is the heap. And the heap is the place dynamically allocate storage exist. And the heap means that you can allocate storage as you want it throughout program execution.

Robert Seacord 00:39:52 And people objects persist till they’re explicitly de-allocated or destroyed. So, these have their very own form of lifetime. It’s primarily based on you, allocating and de-allocating.

Gavin Henry 00:40:08 In order that’s the place the leak may occur. Corrupt.

Robert Seacord 00:39:12 Yeah. So there’s the buffer overflows on the heap, and people are exploitable and the way they’re exploited is determined by the implementation of your reminiscence supervisor. Some reminiscence managers implement the knuth algorithm, which makes use of every boundary tags the place you’ll have management constructions earlier than and after every allotted blocks. So if you happen to write past the bounds of the allotted object, you’ll begin overriding these management constructions within the heap, corrupting the heap, and an attacker may overwrite these constructions mainly once more, to our safety per advised. And the specifics of that depend upon the implementation of the allocator.

Robert Seacord 00:40:58 However there’s additionally two different lessons of issues, at the very least two different class issues with reminiscence, allotted reminiscence. So, one is you allocate reminiscence, and then you definately fail to deallocate to launch it. That’s a reminiscence leak. And a reminiscence leak may be benign if in case you have a brief working program and also you don’t ever exhaust reminiscence. However if in case you have one thing like a server that’s going to run for prolonged durations of time, because it runs, if it’s persevering with leaking reminiscence, that reminiscence is not accessible to the reminiscence allocator to allocate to the method. So finally that system goes to exhaust reminiscence and that kind of defect as soon as that occurs, your server’s not going to be very efficient at serving. As a result of it’s going to begin having reminiscence failures and continuously be in a state of making an attempt to get well from reminiscence errors.

Robert Seacord 00:42:05 And in order that scenario is type of referred to as useful resource exhaustion. And one type of assault is denial of service assault by useful resource exhaustion, proper? The place an attacker finds a reminiscence leak in your system, exploits that to exhaust your reminiscence. And now it seems that your server is operational, however truly it’s not serving requests as a result of it’s out of reminiscence and it will possibly’t operate correctly. So out of reminiscence, failing to correctly deallocate storage when it’s not required, can result in these types of denial of service assaults. The opposite downside is you possibly can unintentionally launch the identical storage a number of occasions. And that’s also known as double free vulnerability. Double free vulnerability is, it seems to be a bit bit totally different, however it will possibly have the identical consequence as a buffer from the heap, which is that an attacker may exploit that to execute arbitrary code. So double free can also be fairly harmful type of coding error.

Gavin Henry 00:43:17 Would you be capable to give an instance of, I do know it’s laborious as a result of it is determined by this system on implementation of the place it’s working and issues, so far as I perceive it. However how can an attacker exploit what you simply defined with a double free, or an over or below on how did they get this code. Is it assembling language that they put within the code and so they inject that into this reminiscence of space, space of reminiscence? Or what does that appear to be?

Robert Seacord 00:43:45 So if we simply mentioned simply type of a fundamental exploit

Gavin Henry 00:43:53 Put in your title or one thing, I donít know, one thing actually.

Robert Seacord 00:43:57 Yeah. In impartial of the error, what can occur is an attacker can inject executable directions into your course of reminiscence, and it will possibly actually try this on any enter operation and there’s legitimate, there’s executable codes, it seems to be like legitimate ASCII. Executable codes that appears like legitimate UTF strings. So no matter kind of string you’re inputting, it’s at all times a good suggestion to validate that string to the extent potential, however typically you simply can’t, typically it’s simply form of a string information.

Gavin Henry 00:44:38 That factor you actually obtained a superb part in your Efficient C e book on validating this system arguments on the commodity. I discover it actually in depth.

Robert Seacord 00:44:48 Oh, thanks. And I imply, safe coning and C and C++ actually goes into these exploits extra. The Efficient C e book is supposed extra of an introductory textual content it. So I don’t attempt to go too in depth in how exploits or methods to write exploits. However I attempt to write that e book to offer form of a robust basis to programmer.

Gavin Henry 00:45:15 I believe that’s why I prefer it a lot.

Robert Seacord 00:45:18 Thanks. I imply, in a means if you happen to code accurately and also you keep away from undefined behaviors, your code is safe. You don’t want to know the way it is perhaps exploited, however the examine of type of how code is exploited is actually motivational. It’s for folks like, oh I’ve obtained legacy code base with tens of hundreds of errors. So how do I prioritize that? And so that you form of speak about what the varied errors are, how they are often exploited, the way you would possibly mitigate in opposition to these issues with typically type of runtime methods, which might defend in opposition to exploits of all of those. After which additionally about safe coding practices, methods to accurately code. So it was not exploitable. However getting a legacy system poorly written, legacy system to be safe is usually a important funding in rewriting and bettering the code.

Gavin Henry 00:46:23 Yeah. I believe you’ve touched properly on to quantity 4, which is on my record, which has inputs. So I’ve obtained some inquiries to do with processing command line arguments, environmental variables, defensive programming, how community site visitors is processed about runtime into information constructions, issues like that. I believe simply actually understanding, listening to what you defined with them, the reminiscence leaks and assault vectors. It simply is determined by how the enter is coming into your program and also you processed it accurately. That might be the, the way it’s if you see the CVE exploit much less, and it says, there’s a double free or a buffer earlier than or one thing in sure conditions doing this, if the wind’s blowing Northwest and also you’re sporting your favourite jumper, this would possibly get exploited kind factor. It simply is determined by the way it’s coming into that program and what this system does. Is {that a} truthful abstract?

Robert Seacord 00:47:24 Yeah. A few of it’s fairly difficult, proper? I imply, so that you’ll take a look at some supply code and it’ll have some undefined conduct and it is perhaps on this platform, below these circumstances with no matter runtime protections can be found. This specific coding error received’t be exploitable, proper? However you could possibly run that on. You can port that to a distinct system. You can run on a distinct platform, you could possibly change one thing in regards to the runtime atmosphere, or you could possibly improve your compiler the place the compilers now used to do one factor with an undefined conduct, however now it’s now they’ve developed an optimization that takes benefit of that undefined conduct to enhance your efficiency. And now an issue which was the error was at all times current within the supply code, however now due to this new optimization, that executable has been modified.

Robert Seacord 00:48:28 And it’s now susceptible to assaults. So typically, many occasions it’s simpler to restore the code than it’s to know all of the potential safety penalties of an exploit. So some instances the place it’s low-cost to repair, normally simply make sense to repair it. I imply, there’s some instances the place if you happen to put some code on the Mars Rover and also you landed on Mars, proper? It’s a bit extra concerned to restore that code, proper? So that you wish to analyze that defect extra. You wish to analyze that vulnerability extra to seek out out whether or not it’s how a lot it was safety danger is, is it value repairing or not, however many instances it’s simply simpler to you to make the restore to the supply code as a result of that’s the tip outlined behaviors get rid of it, you shouldn’t have vulnerabilities generally. Now there are vulnerabilities which might exist absent of undefined conduct. These may be logical errors or simply easy issues like a reminiscence leak, proper? So in case your program unintentionally prints out or logs some personally identifiable data, it doesn’t essentially need to have undefined conduct to do this. Proper? So you could possibly have, I virtually wish to use the phrase insecure by design the place there’s not,

Gavin Henry 00:50:05 This has nothing to do with C, that’s simply engineering software program, engineering is just not proper?

Robert Seacord 00:50:10 Proper.

Gavin Henry 00:50:12 Okay. And I believe that was a superb abstract. And so with an improved compiler, may that cart to double free, if it’s monitoring the quantity of occasions you freed one thing or what? A rubbish assortment system?

Robert Seacord 00:50:28 Oh yeah. Properly, C doesn’t actually have rubbish assortment.

Gavin Henry 00:50:33 That was simply an instance.

Robert Seacord 00:50:34 Yeah. So double free, these kind of errors, there are methods to catch it. Proper? So, one mechanism is simply to, so compiler does some evaluation, proper? It doesn’t do loads of evaluation. So there’s, they’re static evaluation instruments that do extra depth, extra in-depth evaluation.

Gavin Henry 00:50:56 So I’m going to the touch on within the subsequent part, I’ve actually loved this center part. So again transfer us on as a result of we’re over our time on this. However so simply the very last thing I’ve in my record, as a result of I believe we’ve performed a very good job. And I didn’t say on the time, however I actually loved their description of the inventory and the heap that made all the pieces actually clear. So the final level is, sorry, that was a nasty pun. It’s dangling pointers. The place are these in what issues that they prompted only a minute or two, after which we’ll transfer on to the instruments that will help you be a greater programmer.

Robert Seacord 00:51:30 Properly it actually prompted dangerous puns, however the issue with a dangling pointer is that it may lead form of immediately to 2 lessons of exploitable defects, proper? One being double free, which we’ve simply mentioned, proper? So if you happen to free a pointer and also you don’t assign it to know, you could possibly free that pointer a your second time and we’ve already mentioned that may be susceptible. Should you do set it to know, and also you free a no pointer, that’s a no ops. In order that has no, no impact on the code. The opposite downside with that dangling pointer is that it’s now pointing to reminiscence, which has been deallocated probably deallocate it after which reallocate it. So writing to that time, or is now undefined conduct and say for that storage is deallocated you write to it, when you deallocate storage, the reminiscence supervisor takes it over and it would use the form of consumer house to insert management constructions with a purpose to observe, hold observe of free blocks of storage. So if you happen to write to those dangling pointers, once more, you could possibly overwrite these management constructions, corrupting the heap, and probably doing that in a means, which once more, makes it potential to execute arbitrary code.

Gavin Henry 00:52:50 Yeah. I’ve seen that in so much in one thing that I do and in my code and in Guisetís e book who I had on the present and who you recognize since you work with them and Requirements, Episode 414, and in addition a shout out to your artwork’s name for the IEEE safe coding and C and C++, and strings and integers and your different article on Efficient C. How I’ve obtained these hyperlinks within the present notes, however all his, and I believe in your code examples, after free, the pointer is ready to zero, which is the null. Glorious, that was a very good protection. Within the final part, I don’t have as a lot time as I hoped, however we’ve performed a superb in some crossovers right here. So we’ve obtained IDs and issues that we use as we’re working the code that try to give us as a lot assist as potential. We’ve obtained a type of constructed instruments, however you talked about earlier static and dynamic evaluation. I believe you talked about dynamic evaluation however Iíll talked about it in right here anyway. So what static within the now and dynamic evaluation and the way do they assist?

Robert Seacord 00:54:00 These are simply form of instruments and approaches to investigate the code and perceive what it does and what potential defects it may need.

Gavin Henry 00:54:14 So I seems to be on the supply code, the bodily recordsdata. Properly, not bodily, the tax file.

Robert Seacord 00:54:19 So static code evaluation, it seems to be like a bit a compiler, proper? So it builds your supply code and construct usually in summary syntax tree. So it creates a construction after which it would construct some further graphs that may be analyzed. And then you definately’ll have a sequence of guidelines the place you say I don’t wish to free a pointer after which free a pointer a second time. And so the static evaluation will study the graphs of the supply code, the summary syntax tree. And it’ll search for totally different structural, very structural defects within the code, or probably do some path evaluation or some information stream evaluation. So static evaluation tends to be superb at discovering, say structural issues in a program it’s not pretty much as good at information stream and management stream kind.

Gavin Henry 00:55:19 There are issues which have caught me on that is the place you returned from the operate as a result of that is an error, however you haven’t freed what youíve allotted beforehand. That’s at all times one thing that I discover in my stuff.

Robert Seacord 00:55:34 There’s some issues which are pretty amenable to a stack evaluation, however ceaselessly reminiscence administration concurrency, these aren’t at all times discoverable by way of stack evaluation. So typically dynamic evaluation is simpler to seek out these kind of issues. And so that you do have issues like deal with sanitizer and thread sanitizer that accessible in claying and GCC and, and these allow you to and quite a lot of different merchandise, however these permit you to instrument the executable. After which as soon as it’s instrument that you just’ll train it, utilizing no matter number of exams you’ve gotten accessible, maybe utilizing fuzz, fuzzers to drive the code with varied inputs. And these interment executable is now we’ll be capable to mainly lure on any type of violation. So their very dynamic evaluation is simpler at discovering issues just like the NAMIC reminiscence points and concurrency points, mainly at run time.

Gavin Henry 00:56:52 A few of the issues that you just’ve talked about in your e book that I’ve performed with and I utilized in my initiatives is the sanitizer ones. The Tsan, which is the thread one, Asan which you talked about as nicely. The deal with sanitizer for reminiscence issues, after which the Ubsan, which is the undefined conduct the place I appear to seek out errors utilizing these is once I’m working my take a look at suite, as a result of I’m not as cautious as I’m truly working the core product because it had been. I at all times discover points the place I’ve set the duty case by I haven’t torn it down or one thing you recognize. Which is form of a biggie and it is best to type out as you discover them. After which a few of the different instruments I see different folks use because the sanitizers, the clang sanitizer one that you just talked about, after which there’s a great deal of, I believe so much, you talked about a number of in your e book, however if you happen to’ve obtained an open supply venture, it’s fairly straightforward to get entry to all these free instruments. However I believe most of them are business. Iíll put the hyperlinks into my present notes for that.

Robert Seacord 00:57:56 And I don’t know the place to go along with this. I imply it actually, C is tough language.

Gavin Henry 00:58:05 It’s easy, however it’s merely laborious as nicely. Isn’t it?

Robert Seacord 00:58:10 Easy. I’m unsure. It’s smaller than different languages. And so I assume from that respect, you could possibly say it’s easy, however thereís so many layers to it that I’m nonetheless peeling after I began programming C in ë95. So it was nonetheless peeling after.

Gavin Henry 00:58:33 And what kind of issues have you ever give you releasing just lately that shocked you?

Robert Seacord 00:58:38 So right here’s a superb one. This was most likely the newest factor that shocked me. So you possibly can outline an Enum and you may have an enumeration fixed, which has a sort, which is totally different from the bottom kind of the enumeration kind.

Gavin Henry 00:58:57 Arenít Enum simply purported to be a factor that meant one thing to you?

Robert Seacord 00:59:04 Properly, there’s this query. There’s at all times this query of what’s the kind of this stuff, proper? So that you write enum coloration, crimson, inexperienced, blue. Okay. So what kind are these issues?

Robert Seacord 00:59:12 So there’s a robust tendency to, nicely, the usual will say that the numeration constants the crimson, inexperienced, blue, these ought to all be INT, however you could possibly say, for instance, you could possibly go your GCC to consumer, flag, which says use you quick enumeration content material. So in a case like that, crimson, inexperienced, blue GCC, your declare would possibly say, oh I’ve solely obtained three values, 0 1 2. I can simply match that non signed char. So I’m going to save lots of numerous storage and make this time signed char. So now you’ve obtained the bottom kind of this object is unsigned char, however the kind of every enumeration fixed is INT. And largely you don’t discover this, however there are instances the place say you’re doing generic programming and also you’re making an attempt to execute some specific code primarily based on the kind of one thing. It would come as a shock to folks to find that the kind of the fixed is totally different than the kind of the enum object. That’s considerably shocking. That’s the one which’s obtained me most just lately.

Gavin Henry 01:00:36 You talked about one thing there that what’s the purpose of a signed char and an unsigned char. simply trigger you talked about it?

Robert Seacord 01:00:43 Properly, signed char and unsigned char mainly small integer sorts. If you wish to symbolize a personality, it is best to use char plain char and all three of these sorts are totally different and incompatible sorts.

Gavin Henry 01:01:00 Good. Okay. Simply earlier than we begin wrapping up the present, simply to place some extra meat into the device part, a superb cowl of static and dynamic evaluation. We’ve talked about the Tsan and Asan and Ubsan.

Gavin Henry 01:01:18 However over the present we spoke about Annex Ok, is that one thing that we will truly use at the moment? Itís been out for some time. You talked about that in your e book and Jens talked about it in his. Do you advocate it?

Robert Seacord 01:01:34 Yeah. I prefer it. There are two college of ideas there and we voted on this within the committee a few occasions and the neighborhood is equally divided on this half. The neighborhood hates it, half the neighborhood likes it. And since it’s in the usual, you possibly can’t get rid of it. You possibly can’t change the usual with out consensus, proper. It’s the established order, until you possibly can’t add something, you possibly can’t take away something with out consensus. And a few of the historical past of this, it began with Microsoft again within the 90ís as a response to some well-publicized vulnerabilities. And mainly it type of improves upon the present string library features by usually including a further argument, which specifies the dimensions of vacation spot array. So now if you name these features, they will decide that there’s not sufficient room on this vacation spot array to make a replica of this string.

Robert Seacord 01:02:40 And so somewhat than write past the bounds of the article, I’m simply going to point an error both by invoking a runtime constraint handler or returning an error worth. And so I like these, I believe they enhance, they made it simpler for novice programmers to keep away from buffer overflows and undefined behaviors. Corporations like Cisco have used these extensively and swear by them. They declare to have had important enchancment in high quality and safety is a results of utilizing these features. So they’re accessible claying and GCC. Plenty of the distributors type of don’t like these libraries that is perhaps as a result of they originated from Microsoft or might be different causes, however there are third occasion model of those libraries you could obtain and use and they’re customary API. So I like them. I might advocate their use.

Gavin Henry 01:03:52 To complete off this part there’s requirements that we speak about. There’s the CERT C pointers, proper. I keep in mind listening to point out by SQL Lite, how they spend a yr getting their C code as much as some medical requirements. Can’t keep in mind what it was. Is {that a} factor? Is that’s one thing youíve heard of? Some kind of medical requirements the place that code is appropriate to be deployed and medical tools, I’ve to do some extra seek for that. Okay, so I believe that was actually good to begin wrapping up. So clearly C is a really highly effective language with a robust historical past and deployment base. But when there was one factor a software program engineer ought to keep in mind from our present, what would you want that to be? If we haven’t coated that or simply one thing you needed to convey to the highest?

Robert Seacord 01:04:43 Okay, I’ll say this, we didn’t spend loads of time speaking about IDs, proper? However there’s an fascinating factor folks say about C programmers is that C programmers are a bit pissed off by type of compiler diagnostics and so they wish to get previous that to allow them to get to the actual job of debugging this system, proper? And there’s one type of programming, which is that this trial and error, proper? So you’ve gotten a little bit of an issue. You Google, you go to stack overflow, you discover a code instance, you copy paste that into your system and also you tweak it. You compile it. It doesn’t compile there’s some diagnostics. Oh yeah. Ms. Title is variable misspells. It makes you enhancements that compiles and then you definately run it in, it doesn’t fairly run.

Robert Seacord 01:05:49 So you modify one thing and now you get a run that succeeds and also you’re like, cool, that’s working onto the subsequent factor. And so this sort of strategy of trial and error, it will possibly get to a program which, which works in a form of, optimum state of affairs, proper? Nevertheless it doesn’t imply that packages. Right, proper? You don’t know the way that program’s going to take care of form of sudden information. And we talked in regards to the enter validation briefly, however actually your code has to work with all potential information values, proper? There can’t be any inputs for which this system’s going to exhibit incorrect conduct. In order that’s the purpose of enter validation and programming generally, proper? Just remember to take care of all, all potential combos of knowledge. So to do that trial and error is actually inadequate. That you must perceive the language, you must perceive the code you’re writing and ensure you perceive all potential instances that you just’re contemplating kind conversions. You’re contemplating integer overflow and all these.

Gavin Henry 01:07:14 I switched to on Mesa, simply use tax, or I believe wherever you employ and there’s a great deal of C plugins, and the period of time you save by simply taking a look at what will get highlighted or earlier than you even clicked construct, otherwise you’ve run a command. Most of your issues are solved if you happen to simply take note of the,

Robert Seacord 01:07:35 Yeah, it helps so much, however it’s nonetheless positively insufficient as a result of all of the tooling, isn’t going to seek out all the issues. So it’s useful to know the language you’re utilizing. And you could possibly obtain that by way of coaching lessons. You possibly can obtain that by way of studying. One factor I did once I type of transitioned from being a programmer to a safe coder is I spent a while, largely in visible studio and I might, I’d write a bit little bit of C supply code and I might type of predict in my head what kind of meeting can be generated from that code. After which I might compile it after which I might be shocked. I might return and browse the usual, like, okay, now I perceive. And so, finally I obtained to the purpose the place I may efficiently predict the meeting code that’s being generated. Till you get to that time, your understanding of the language is type of falling quick, proper?

Gavin Henry 01:08:41 Yeah, there’s one thing to be stated for simply truly experimenting and I wish to name it “proving it to your self,” mainly have the belief and write a job or one thing.

Robert Seacord 01:08:55 Yeah. And what I do is ideal some code proper. The place I gained loads of confidence. I perceive this, I do know what that is. I can use this and now I’ve obtained a form of a reusable part I can use, however it’s fairly harmful to type of simply throw in a bunch of issues as a result of they’re there with out actually understanding but. So, I imply, possibly it’s extra enjoyable, however it doesn’t essentially produce safe methods.

Gavin Henry 01:09:28 So, simply to summarize earlier than we shut up the podcast, what one factor would you want them to recollect? Is that, be good along with your IDE, choose a superb one, or show your assumptions, or what would you want them to recollect out of that?

Robert Seacord 01:09:48 I might say the most effective time to keep away from the defect is if you’re coding. It’s higher to write down right code initially than it’s to attempt to discover and restore defects downstream. I imply, right coding, high quality code, safe code, it’s tough to attain. And you really want to make use of all of the accessible instruments and processes and self-discipline to get near attaining that. However yeah, crucial factor is type of writing code securely to start with.

Gavin Henry 01:10:39 Thanks. If folks wish to discover out extra and discover a few of these issues we’ve chatted about, the place’s the most effective place to get in contact? You’re fairly energetic on Twitter, is that the most effective place?

Robert Seacord 01:10:49 Properly, I may be discovered on Twitter. I’ve a web site, RobertSeacord.com, I believe the place I’ve obtained some errata for the Efficient C e book.

Gavin Henry 01:11:04 I believe you must replace your SSL certificates as I used to be taking a look at it final week and it was complaining that it was insecure of all issues. Okay. So your Twitter account and your web site.

Robert Seacord 01:11:16 You possibly can look there. I’m on LinkedIn, as nicely. I’m not very laborious to seek out, I don’t have any handles wherever.

Gavin Henry 01:11:25 I assume it’s @RCS on Twitter for those who wish to go there immediately. Okay. Robert, thanks for approaching the present. It’s been an actual pleasure. That is Gavin Henry for Software program Engineering Radio. Thanks for listening. [End of Audio]